Author:

Whooley, Mark

Bernd, Ploderer.

Gray, Kathleen

Abstract:

Self-tracking, the process of recording one’s own behaviours, thoughts and feelings, is a popular approach to enhance one’s self-knowledge. While dedicated self-tracking apps and devices support data collection, previous research highlights that the integration of data constitutes a barrier for users. In this study we investigated how members of the Quantified Self movement—early adopters of self-tracking tools—overcome these barriers. We conducted a qualitative analysis of 51 videos of Quantified Self presentations to explore intentions for collecting data, methods for integrating and representing data, and how intentions and methods shaped reflection. The findings highlight two different intentions—striving for self-improvement and curiosity in personal data—which shaped how these users integrated data, i.e. the effort required. Furthermore, we identified three methods for representing data—binary, structured and abstract—which influenced reflection. Binary representations supported reflection-in-action, whereas structured and abstract representations supported iterative processes of data collection, integration and reflection. For people tracking out of curiosity, this iterative engagement with personal data often became an end in itself, rather than a means to achieve a goal. We discuss how these findings contribute to our current understanding of self-tracking amongst Quantified Self members and beyond, and we conclude with directions for future work to support self-trackers with their aspirations.

Document:

https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/hci2014.16

References:
  1. Birks, M., Chapman, Y. and Francis, K. (2008) Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing, 13(1), pp. 68–75.
  2. Choe, E. K., Lee, N. B., Lee, B., Pratt, W. and Kientz, J. A. (2014) Understanding Quantified-Selfers’ Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. in CHI 2014: ACM. pp. 1143–1152.
  3. Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I. and Landay, J. A. (2006) Design requirements for technologies that encourage physical activity. in CHI 2006, New York: ACM. pp. 457–466.
  4. Dourish, P. and Mazmanian, M. (2011) Media as Material: Information Representations as Material Foundations for Organizational Practice. in Process Symposium 2011, Corfu, Greece. pp. 1–24.
  5. Fox, S. and Duggan, M. (2013) Tracking for Health Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project.
  6. Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B. and Landay, J. A. (2009) UbiGreen: Investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. in CHI 2009, New York: ACM. pp. 1043–1052.
  7. Gaver, W. W., Beaver, J. and Benford, S. (2003) Ambiguity as a resource for design. in SIGCHI 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA: ACM. pp. 233–240.
  8. Kaipainen, K., Honka, A. and Saranummi, N. (2011) Personalized behavior change support for disease prevention. in EMBS 2011, United States: IEEE. pp. 880–883.
  9. Khovanskaya, V., Baumer, E. P. S., Cosley, D., Voida, S. and Gay, G. K. (2013) “Everybody Knows What You’re Doing”: A Critical Design Approach to Personal Informatics. in CHI 2013, Paris, France: ACM. pp. 3403–3412.
  10. Li, I., Dey, A. and Forlizzi, J. (2010) A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. in CHI 2010: ACM. pp. 557–566.
  11. Li, I., Dey, A. and Forlizzi, J. (2011) Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. in UbiComp 2011: ACM. pp. 405–414.
  12. Li, I., Dey, A. and Forlizzi, J. (2012) Using context to reveal factors that affect physical activity. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 19(1), pp. 1–21.
  13. Lupton, D. (2013) Quantifying the body: monitoring and measuring health in the age of mHealth technologies. Critical Public Health, pp. 1–11.
  14. Miles, M. B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  15. Neuman, W. L. (2011) Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches, 7th ed., Boston: Ally & Bacon.
  16. Ng, T., Ou Jie, Z. and Cosley, D. (2011) pieTime: Visualizing Communication Patterns. in PASSAT 2011 / SocialCom 2011: IEEE. pp. 720–723.
  17. ON World (2013) Mobile Sensing Health & Wellness, Available: http://onworld.com/mobilesensing/health/ {Accessed 18 November 2014}.
  18. Pierce, J. and Paulos, E. (2012) Beyond energy monitors: interaction, energy, and emerging energy systems. in CHI 2012, Austin, Texas, USA: ACM. pp. 665–674.
  19. Ploderer, B., Leong, T., Ashkanasy, S. and Howard, S. (2012a) A process of engagement: engaging with the process. in DIS 2012, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom: ACM. pp. 224–233.
  20. Ploderer, B., Smith, W., Howard, S., Pearce, J. and Borland, R. (2012b) Things you don’t want to know about yourself: ambivalence about tracking and sharing personal information for behaviour change. in OzCHI 2012, Melbourne, Australia: ACM. pp. 489–492.
  21. Quantified Self (2013) Quantified Self, Available: http://quantifiedself.com/ {Accessed 18 August.
  22. Rawassizadeh, R., Tomitsch, M., Wac, K. and Tjoa, A. M. (2012) UbiqLog: a generic mobile phone-based life-log framework. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 17(4), pp. 621.
  23. Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A. and Chalmers, M. C. (2014) Personal Tracking as Lived Informatics. in CHI 2014. pp. 1163–1172
  24. Rosner, D. K. and Ryokai, K. (2009) Reflections on craft: Probing the creative process of everyday knitters. in C&C 2009, New York: ACM. pp. 195–204.
  25. Schön, D. A. (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action, New York: Basic Books.
  26. Sennett, R. (2008) The craftsman, London: Yale University Press.
  27. Smith, B. K., Frost, J., Albayrak, M. and Sudhakar, R. (2007) Integrating glucometers and digital photography as experience capture tools to enhance patient understanding and communication of diabetes self-management practices. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(4), pp. 273–286.
  28. Tufte, E. R. (1983) The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press.

The SELF Institute