Author(s):

Reza Rawassizadeh

Elaheh Momeni

Chelsea Dobbins

Pejman Mirza-Babaei

Ramin Rahnamoun

Abstract

The ubiquity and affordability of mobile and wearable devices has enabled us to continually and digitally record our daily life activities. Consequently, we are seeing the growth of data collection experiments in several scientific disciplines. Although these have yielded promising results, mobile and wearable data collection experiments are often restricted to a specific configuration that has been designed for a unique study goal. These approaches do not address all the real-world challenges of “continuous data collection” systems. As a result, there have been few discussions or reports about such issues that are faced when “implementing these platforms” in a practical situation. To address this, we have summarized our technical and user-centric findings from three lifelogging and Quantified Self data collection studies, which we have conducted in real-world settings, for both smartphones and smartwatches. In addition to (i) privacy and (ii) battery related issues; based on our findings we recommend further works to consider (iii) implementing multivariate reflection of the data; (iv) resolving the uncertainty and data loss; and (v) consider to minimize the manual intervention required by users. These findings have provided insights that can be used as a guideline for further Quantified Self or lifelogging studies. 

Document:

https://www.mdpi.com/2224-2708/4/4/315#abstractc

References:
  1. Dodge, M.; Kitchin, R. Outlines of a world coming into existence: Pervasive computing and the ethics of forgetting. Environ. Plan. 2007, 34, 431–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dobbins, C.; Merabti, M.; Fergus, P.; Llewellyn-Jones, D. Augmenting Human Digital Memories with Physiological Data. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Network Embedded Systems for Every Application (NESEA), Liverpool, UK, 13–14 December 2012; pp. 35–41.
  3. Dobbins, C.; Merabti, M.; Fergus, P.; Llewellyn-Jones, D. Capturing Human Digital Memories for Assisting Memory Recall. In Advances in Physiological Computing; Springer: London, UK, 2014; pp. 211–234. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rawassizadeh, R.; Price, B.A.; Petre, M. Wearables: Has the age of smartwatches finally arrived? Commun. ACM 2015, 58, 45–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eagle, N.; Pentland, A. Reality mining: Sensing Complex Social Systems. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2006, 10, 255–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Aharony, N.; Pan, W.; Ip, C.; Khayal, I.; Pentland, A. Social fMRI: Investigating and Shaping Social Mechanisms in the Real World. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2011, 7, 643–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kiukkonen, N.; Blom, J.; Dousse, O.; Gatica-Perez, D.; Laurila, J. Towards Rich Mobile Phone Datasets: Lausanne Data Collection Campaign. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Services, Berlin, Germany, 13–15 July 2010.
  8. Wagner, D.T.; Rice, A.; Beresford, A.R. Device analyzer: Largescale Mobile Data Collection. ACM SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev. 2014, 41, 53–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leger, D. Inside Wearables Part 2: A Look at the Uncertain Future of Smart Wearable Devices, and Five Industry Developments that Will Be Necessary for Meaningful Mass Market Adoption and Sustained Engagement; Technical Report; Endeavour Partners: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. Whittaker, S.; Kalnikaitė, V.; Petrelli, D.; Sellen, A.; Villar, N.; Bergman, O.; Clough, P.; Brockmeier, J. Socio-technical lifelogging: Deriving design principles for a future proof digital past. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2012, 27, 37–62. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hasan, M.; Kashyap, A.; Hristidis, V.; Tsotras, V. User Effort Minimization through Adaptive Diversification. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, 24–27 August 2014; pp. 203–212.
  12. Wearables are Totally Failing the People Who Need them Most. Available online: http://www.wired.com/2014/11/where-fitness-trackers-fail (accessed on 3 November 2015).
  13. Shih, P.C.; Han, K.; Poole, E.S.; Rosson, M.B.; Carroll, J.M. Use and Adoption Challenges of Wearable Activity Trackers. In Proceedings of the iConference, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 24–27 March 2015.
  14. Marcengo, A.; Rapp, A. Visualization of Human Behavior Data: The Quantified Self. In Innovative Approaches of Data Visualization and Visual Analytics; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2013; pp. 236–265. [Google Scholar]
  15. Reiss, A.; Stricker, D. Personalized mobile physical activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Zurich, Switzerland, 8–12 September 2013; pp. 25–28.
  16. Bao, H.; Wong, W.C. A Novel Map-based Dead-Reckoning Algorithm for Indoor Localization. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2014, 3, 44–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rawassizadeh, R.; Tomitsch, M.; Wac, K.; Tjoa, A.M. UbiqLog: A generic mobile phone-based life-log framework. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2013, 17, 621–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gurrin, C.; Smeaton, A.F.; Doherty, A.R. LifeLogging: Personal big data. Found. Trends Inform. Retr. 2014, 8, 1–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chon, Y.; Wanchang, R.; Hojung, C. Predicting smartphone battery usage using cell tower ID monitoring. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2014, 13, 99–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rawassizadeh, R.; Tomitsch, M.; Nourizadeh, M.; Momeni, E.; Peery, A.; Ulanova, L.; Pazzani, M. Energy-Efficient Integration of Continuous Context Sensing and Prediction into Smartwatches. Sensors 2015, 15, 22616–22645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Poh, M.Z.; Swenson, N.C.; Picard, R.W. A Wearable Sensor for Unobtrusive, Long-term Assessment of Electrodermal Activity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2007, 57, 1243–1252. [Google Scholar]
  22. Berlin, E.; Laerhoven, K.V. Detecting Leisure Activities with Dense Motif Discovery. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 5–8 September 2012; pp. 250–259.
  23. Mankodiya, K.; de la Torre, F.; Zhang, A.; Ryan, N.; Ton, T.G.; Ganhdi, R.; Jain, S. SPARK: Personalized Parkinson Disease Interventions through Synergy between a Smartphone and a Smartwatch. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. User Experience Design for Everyday Life Applications and Services; Springer International Publishing: Crete, Greece, 2014; pp. 103–114. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dong, Y.; Hoover, A.; Scisco, J.; Muth, E. A new method for measuring meal intake in humans via automated wrist motion tracking. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2012, 37, 205–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maurer, U.; Rowe, A.; Smailagic, A.; Siewiorek, D.P. eWatch: A wearable sensor and notification platform. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, Cambridge, MA, USA, 3–5 April 2006.
  26. Begum, N.; Keogh, E. Rare Time Series Motif Discovery from Unbounded Streams. Proc. VLDB Endow. 2014, 8, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Henze, N.; Poppinga, B.; Pielot, M.; Schinke, T.; Boll, S. My app is an experiment: Experience from user studies in mobile app stores. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2011, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ferreira, D.; Kostakos, V.; Dey, A.K. Lessons learned from large-scale user studies: Using android market as a source of data. Int. J. Mob. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2012, 4, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Blanke, U.; Troster, G.; Franke, T.; Lukowicz, P. Capturing crowd dynamics at large scale events using participatory GPS-localization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, Singapore, 21–24 April 2014; pp. 1–7.
  30. Li, I.; Dey, A.K.; Forlizzi, J. Understanding my Data, Myself: Supporting Self-Reflection with Ubicomp Technologies. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Beijing, China, 17–21 September 2011; pp. 405–414.
  31. Oh, J.; Lee, U. Exploring UX issues in Quantified Self technologies. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Mobile Computing and Ubiquitous Networking (ICMU), Hakodate, Japan, 20–22 January 2015; pp. 53–59.
  32. Choe, E.K.; Lee, N.B.; Lee, B.; Pratt, W.; Kientz, J.A. Understanding Quantified-Selfers’ Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, 26 April–1 May 2014; pp. 1143–1152.
  33. Rooksby, J.; Rost, M.; Morrison, A.; Chalmers, M.C. Personal Tracking as Lived Informatics. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, 26 April–1 May 2014; pp. 1163–1172.
  34. Fritz, T.; Huang, E.M.; Murphy, G.C.; Zimmermann, T. Persuasive technology in the real world: A study of long-term use of activity sensing devices for fitness. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, 26 April–1 May 2014; pp. 487–496.
  35. Bargas-Avila, J.; Hornbæk, K. Foci and Blind Spots in User Experience Research. ACM Interact. 2012, 19, 24–27. [Google Scholar]
  36. UbiqLog. Available online: http://github.com/rezar/ubiqlog (accessed on 3 November 2015).
  37. Rawassizadeh, R.; Heurix, J.; Khosravipour, S.; Tjoa, A.M. LiDSec—A Lightweight Pseudonymization Approach for Privacy-Preserving Publishing of Textual Personal Information. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, Vienna, Austria, 22–26 August 2011; pp. 603–608.
  38. SleepBot. Available online: http://mysleepbot.com (accessed on 3 November 2015).
  39. Watson, D.; Lee, A.C.; Auke, T. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 54, 1063–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. I’m Watch smartwatch. Available online: http://www.imsmart.com (accessed on 3 November 2015).
  41. Russell, J.A. A Circumplex Model of Affect. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1980, 39, 1161–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Paradis, F.; Berrut, C. Experiments with theme extraction in explanatory texts. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Conceptions of Library and Information Science, CoLIS, Copenhagen, Denmark, 13–16 October 1996; pp. 433–437.
  43. Rawassizadeh, R. Towards sharing life-log information with society. Behav. Inform. Technol. 2012, 31, 1057–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rawassizadeh, R. Mobile application benchmarking based on the resource usage monitoring. Int. J. Mob. Comput. Multimed. Commun. 2009, 1, 64–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dey, A.K.; Wac, K.; Ferreira, D.; Tassini, K.; Hong, J.H.; Ramos, J. Getting closer: An empirical investigation of the proximity of user to their smart phones. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Beijing, China, 17–21 September 2011; pp. 163–172.
  46. Lee, J.M.; Youngwon, K.; Gregory, J.W. Validity of Consumer-based Physical Activity Monitors. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2014, 46, 1840–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lane, N.D.; Georgiev, P. Can Deep Learning Revolutionize Mobile Sensing? In Proceedings of the 16th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Santa Fe, NM, USA, 12–13 February 2015; pp. 117–122.
  48. Moves. Available online: http://movestheapp.com (accessed on 3 November 2015).
  49. Swan, M. Sensor mania! The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. J. Sens. Actuator Netw. 2012, 1, 217–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cordeiro, F.; Epstein, D.A.; Thomaz, E.; Bales, E.; Jagannathan, A.K.; Abowd, G.D.; Fogarty, J. Barriers and Negative Nudges: Exploring Challenges in Food Journaling. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Korea, 18–23 April 2015; pp. 1159–1162.
  51. Sleep Monitoring Device. Available online: http:// www.wired.com/2014/10/nintendo-sleep-qol-health (accessed on 3 November 2015).
The SELF Institute