Author(s):

  • Nathalie Bressa
  • Jo Vermeulen
  • Wesley Willett

Abstract:

We explore the design and utility of situated manual self-tracking visualizations on dedicated displays that integrate data tracking into existing practices and physical environments. Situating self-tracking tools in relevant locations is a promising approach to enable reflection on and awareness of data without needing to rely on sensorized tracking or personal devices. In both a long-term autobiographical design process and a co-design study with six participants, we rapidly prototyped and deployed 30 situated self-tracking applications over a ten month period. Grounded in the experience of designing and living with these trackers, we contribute findings on logging and data entry, the use of situated displays, and the visual design and customization of trackers. Our results demonstrate the potential of customizable dedicated self-tracking visualizations that are situated in relevant physical spaces, and suggest future research opportunities and new potential applications for situated visualizations.

Documentation:

https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517737

References:

  1. Parastoo Abtahi, Victoria Ding, Anna C. Yang, Tommy Bruzzese, Alyssa B. Romanos, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Sean Follmer, and James A. Landay. 2020. Understanding Physical Practices and the Role of Technology in Manual Self-Tracking. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 4, 4, Article 115 (Dec. 2020), 24 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3432236Google ScholarDigital Library
  2. Phil Adams, Elizabeth L. Murnane, Michael Elfenbein, Elaine Wethington, and Geri Gay. 2017. Supporting the Self-Management of Chronic Pain Conditions with Tailored Momentary Self-Assessments. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025832Google ScholarDigital Library
  3. Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, Anna L. Cox, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Quantifying the Body and Caring for the Mind: Self-Tracking in Multiple Sclerosis. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 6889–6901. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025869Google ScholarDigital Library
  4. Amid Ayobi, Tobias Sonne, Paul Marshall, and Anna L. Cox. 2018. Flexible and Mindful Self-Tracking: Design Implications from Paper Bullet Journals. In Proc. of CHI ’18. ACM, Article 28, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173602Google ScholarDigital Library
  5. Dominikus Baur. 2017. Silent Augmented Reality. Hacker Noon (18 Aug 2017). https://hackernoon.com/silent-augmented-reality-f0f7614cab32 https://hackernoon.com/silent-augmented-reality-f0f7614cab32.Google Scholar
  6. Frank Bentley and Konrad Tollmar. 2013. The Power of Mobile Notifications to Increase Wellbeing Logging Behavior. In Proc. of CHI ’13. ACM, 1095–1098. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466140Google ScholarDigital Library
  7. Susanne Bødker, Kaj Grønbæk, and Morten Kyng. 1993. Cooperative design: Techniques and experiences from the Scandinavian scene. In Participatory design. Principles and practices, Doug Schuler and Aki Namioka (Eds.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 157–176.Google Scholar
  8. Michael Bostock, Vadim Ogievetsky, and Jeffrey Heer. 2011. D3: Data-Driven Documents. IEEE Trans. Visualization & Comp. Graphics (Proc. InfoVis) (2011). http://vis.stanford.edu/papers/d3Google Scholar
  9. Nathalie Bressa, Kendra Wannamaker, Henrik Korsgaard, Wesley Willett, and Jo Vermeulen. 2019. Sketching and Ideation Activities for Situated Visualization Design. In Proc. of DIS ’19. ACM, 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322326Google ScholarDigital Library
  10. Gharad Bryan, Dean Karlan, and Scott Nelson. 2010. Commitment devices. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2, 1 (2010), 671–698.Google Scholar
  11. Scott Carter and Jennifer Mankoff. 2005. When Participants Do the Capturing: The Role of Media in Diary Studies. In Proc. of CHI ’05. ACM, 899–908. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1055098Google ScholarDigital Library
  12. Keith Cheverst, Alan Dix, Daniel Fitton, Mark Rouncefield, and Connor Graham. 2007. Exploring Awareness Related Messaging through Two Situated-Display-Based Systems. Human–Computer Interaction 22, 1-2 (May 2007), 173–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370020701307955Google Scholar
  13. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Matthew Kay, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2015. SleepTight: Low-Burden, Self-Monitoring Technology for Capturing and Reflecting on Sleep Behaviors. In Proc. of Ubicomp ’15. ACM, 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1145/2750858.2804266Google ScholarDigital Library
  14. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding Self-Reflection: How People Reflect on Personal Data through Visual Data Exploration. In Proc. of PervasiveHealth ’17. ACM, 173–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154881Google ScholarDigital Library
  15. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B. Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A. Kientz. 2014. Understanding Quantified-Selfers’ Practices in Collecting and Exploring Personal Data. In Proc. of CHI ’14. ACM, 1143–1152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557372Google ScholarDigital Library
  16. Chia-Fang Chung, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Sonali Mishra, James Fogarty, and Sean A. Munson. 2017. When Personal Tracking Becomes Social: Examining the Use of Instagram for Healthy Eating. In Proc. of CHI ’17. ACM, 1674–1687. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025747Google ScholarDigital Library
  17. Sandy Claes, Jorgos Coenen, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2018. Conveying a Civic Issue Through Data via Spatially Distributed Public Visualization and Polling Displays. In Proc. of NordiCHI ’18. ACM, 597–608. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240167.3240206Google ScholarDigital Library
  18. Sandy Claes and Andrew Vande Moere. 2013. Street Infographics: Raising Awareness of Local Issues Through a Situated Urban Visualization. In Proc. of PerDis ’13. ACM, 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1145/2491568.2491597Google ScholarDigital Library
  19. Jorgos Coenen, Maarten Houben, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2019. Citizen Dialogue Kit: Public Polling and Data Visualization Displays for Bottom-Up Citizen Participation. In Proc. of DIS ’19 Companion. ACM, 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3325160Google ScholarDigital Library
  20. Jorgos Coenen, Eslam Nofal, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2019. How the Arrangement of Content and Location Impact the Use of Multiple Distributed Public Displays. In Proc. of DIS ’19. ACM, 1415–1426. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322294Google ScholarDigital Library
  21. Sunny Consolvo, Katherine Everitt, Ian Smith, and James A. Landay. 2006. Design Requirements for Technologies That Encourage Physical Activity. In Proc. of CHI 06’. ACM, 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124840Google Scholar